Posted at 09:53h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT : In terms of Rule 127, when
Assessing Officer issues reassessment notice, he is under a duty to access
available PAN data base of addressee or address available in last income return
filed by addressee
■■■
[2019] 410 ITR 023 (Delhi)
[2019] 102 taxmann.com 470 (Delhi)
HIGH
COURT OF DELHI
Veena
Devi...
Posted at 14:26h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT : An 'undertaking or an enterprise' established after 7-1-2003, and carried out 'substantial expansion' within specified window period, i.e., between 7-1-2003 and 1-4-2012, would be entitled to deduction on profits at rate of 100 per cent, under section 80-IC post said expansion
■■■
[2017] 88 taxmann.com...
Posted at 14:24h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT: There being no express bar in Act regarding application of accounting standards prescribed by ICAI, deduction on account of lease equalization charges from lease rental income could have been allowed under Act, on basis of these accounting standards
■■■
[2018] 92 taxmann.com 370 (SC)
SUPREME COURT...
Posted at 14:22h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT : Inland Container Depots are Inland Ports, subject to provisions of section 80-IA and deduction can be claimed for income earned out of these Depots
■■■
[2018] 93 taxmann.com 31 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1
v.
Container Corporation of India Ltd.*
R. K. AGRAWAL...
Posted at 18:48h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
[2017] 395 ITR 255 (Del)
[IN THE DELHI HIGH COURT]
RAJIV AGARWAL
(W. P. (C) No. 9659 of 2015)
VIJAY LAXMI AGARWAL
(W. P. (C) No. 9661 of 2015)
v.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANOTHER
S. MURALIDHAR and VIBHU BAKHRU JJ.
March 16, 2016.
Section(s): Income-tax Act, 1961, ss....
Posted at 07:01h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
[2017] 398 ITR 316 (Del)
[IN THE DELHI HIGH COURT]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
v.
(1) VASAVI PRATAP CHAND (2) SIDHARTH P. CHAND (and vice versa)
______
DR. S. MURALIDHAR and MS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH JJ. August 23, 2017.
Section(s): Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 002(47)
Assessment Year: 1995-96
Favouring: Assessee, person /Department/Department of State/Union Government,...
Posted at 08:13h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
[2017] 394 ITR 411 (Delhi)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Director of Income-tax (Exemptions)
v.
Vishwa Hindu Parishad
DR. S. MURALIDHAR AND ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA, JJ.
IT APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2004
MAY 8, 2017
Section 11, read with section 12A, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable or religious trust - Exemption...
Posted at 03:33h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT: Where impugned notices under section 148 seeking to re-open assessment of assessee were issued to assessee after it had amalgamated with petitioner company and was no longer in existence, they were invalid and had to be set aside
■■■
[2016] 67 taxmann.com 284 (Delhi)
HIGH COURT...
Posted at 18:54h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
IT: Where department intended to proceed under section 147 against assessee when he was already dead, it could have been done so by issuing a notice to legal representative of assessee within period of limitation for issuance of notice
■■■
[2016] 67 taxmann.com 56 (Delhi)
HIGH COURT...
Posted at 18:53h
in
Cases Reported
by venkatism
[2011] 9 taxmann.com 196(DELHI)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sri Venkateshwar Educational Society (Regd.)*
v.
Director General of Income-tax (Exemptions)
A. K. SIKRI AND VALMIKI J. MEHTA, JJ.
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8590 OF 2009
SEPTEMBER 23, 2009
Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Educational institutions - Assessment year 2007-08 - Assessee...